PDA

View Full Version : Wow! -- Mad Max is back, no joke


Dene
10-12-2002, 09:48
Mel's big Max attack

Gibson, Miller back for road warrior pic

By CLAUDE BRODESSER


Mel Gibson, who toplined the 1979 cult hit "Mad Max," is returning to the franchise once again, this time at Twentieth Century Fox.
He'll be paid a salary approaching $25 million under the helm of the original "Mad Max" director, George Miller, toplining a script that Miller has been crafting the last three years. Pic is entitled "Fury Road" and will once again feature Mad Max in the lawless, post-apocalpytic Australian outback.

Fox insiders say plans call for the $104 million megapic to begin lensing in Australia, with next May as the targeted start date.

"This is the most exhaustively prepared movie I have ever been associated with," said Hutch Parker, the prexy of production at Twentieth Century Fox. "The script is as ready as they come."

Miller got the rights to the Mad Max franchise back from Warner Bros. as part of a settlement with the studio in 1997. Warners, which released both "Mad Max: The Road Warrior" in 1981 and "Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome" in 1985, gave him the rights after Miller -- who'd directed and co-written all three movies -- agreed to detach himself from Warner Bros.' Jodie Foster-starrer "Contact" and allow Robert Zemeckis to helm.

Pic will be produced by Miller and longtime producing partner Doug Mitchell, and by Gibson's producing partner Bruce Davey at Icon, which is also handling select foreign territories. Insiders familiar with the deal say Icon will sell the rights to Australia, England and one other unnamed European territory.

Talks started in earnest about 10 months ago, shortly after Icon signed a two-year first-look production deal with 20th Century Fox, ending a long-term association with Paramount. Then, at the start of the summer, secret script readings began in Bruce Davey's kitchen.

Says Parker: "The script's been so tightly controlled, it would have been easier to get into the NSA (National Security Administration)."

Deal marks both the first pic that Miller will direct since the 1998 sequel to his 1995 script "Babe," and the first pic that he's ever directed for Fox, which has been courting him for years.

The trilogy of "Mad Max" pics, for all their iconic value, amounted to a rather slender B.O., grossing only $69 million in total domestically. That's partly because the 1979 original, released by Village Roadshow, Orion Pictures and AIP, was hardly seen Stateside at all. Franchise only grew significant with "Mad Max: The Road Warrior."

But, says Parker, "there are so few roles that define 'big screen action hero' and this is one of them. This is an event movie, and we know how to market event movies. It's Max the way you want to see him."

In October, Gibson's Icon deal at Fox yielded a greenlit picture in "Paparazzi," a pic that starts lensing in February, with Cole Hauser toplining.

In September, the ICM-repped Gibson committed to return to the director's chair with "The Passion," starring James Caviezel in a chronicle of the final 12 hours in the life of Jesus Christ.

Hateincarnate
10-12-2002, 11:22
Cheers for the info. Very excited!

Hmm i wonder if Mel wil combine it with his Jesus Biopic,?

martinb
10-12-2002, 11:28
it will probably revolve around a band of evil english nomad bikers performing barbarous acts in a heinous manner.

Nick Laslett
10-12-2002, 14:12
This is fantastic news. Reading between the lines it would appear that George Miller was not interested in continuing the series whislt Warner had ultimate control. I guess Mel would not star in the film if it was not helmed by Miller.

I'm a big fan of George Miller and his long term inactivity has been a real disappointment for me. Interesting to hear that he was bumped from Contact. He certainly got a good deal.

The first Mad Max film I saw was Mad Max 2. I was 10 years old. This would have been in '83. The years preceeding this the seeds of the myth of Mad Max had already been sowed. Me and my friends would fantasize about the contents of the film based on rumors we had heard. It had a similar rep to Texas Chainsaw Massacre. We weren't disappointed when we finally got to see the finished films.

I saw Mad Max 3 at the cinema aged 14. I wasn't disappointed at the time, but realise now that it was basically a big budget remake of 2.

I heard anecdotes that Brian Kennedy was the real driving force behind the series. When he died in a helicopter accident during the making of 2, the imagination left the series. Most of the plot of Mad Max 3 was reheated ideas from MM2 story sessions. I would hope with so much time elapsing since MM3, that George has been able to get the creative juices flowing.

Island Swing
10-12-2002, 14:15
Is Mel not getting a bit old for this?

Great original movies, well 1 and 2 anyway but I thought that 3 and Tina Turner had done enough damage to completely kill the franchise

Dene
10-12-2002, 15:32
Mel Gibson is 46 or so, I don't think that's too old...

I agree that Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome was a bit disappointing, but I have faith that they'll pull out the stops for this one. After all that was 1985 -- this is really like a new start rather than yet another installment.

Willow
10-12-2002, 17:43
Originally posted by Dene
He'll be paid a salary approaching $25 :eek:

danielzavitz
10-12-2002, 21:56
that's $25 MILLION willow.
i too would be shocked if he was doing it for $25.

Bamse
10-12-2002, 22:09
It could be really good, if and it's a big IF, they do it right.

Ol' Blue Eyes
10-12-2002, 22:25
Mel has to do something commercial to balance his Jesus film, which could be great or could be disastrous but is unlikelty to attract many punters either way. I'd heard Lethal Weapon 5 was in the pipeline but this looks miles more exciting. I'm a big fan of the Mad Max films and I rate Thunderdome as a classic action movie that never got the appreciation it deserves. I'd absolutely love to see what Miller would come up with 20 years later and with a big budget. Go for it, I say, this could be the kind of ambitious, imaginative project that makes blockbusters fun and not just cynical franchises.

Lenny Nero
10-12-2002, 22:43
Yeah, as good as Lethal Weapon movies are, we got 4 of them, and only 3 Mad Maxes, 2 good ones at that, so this is excellent news! Should have done it earlier probably, then maybe he'd be doing Mad Max 6 now, but it's ok.

Michael Brooke
11-12-2002, 00:02
Originally posted by Nick Laslett
I heard anecdotes that Brian Kennedy was the real driving force behind the series. When he died in a helicopter accident during the making of 2, the imagination left the series. Most of the plot of Mad Max 3 was reheated ideas from MM2 story sessions. I would hope with so much time elapsing since MM3, that George has been able to get the creative juices flowing.

Byron Kennedy was certainly a major creative force behind the <I>Mad Max</I> films, but there's no doubting Miller's talent - amongst the films on which he took a solo directing credit (<I>Mad Max, Mad Max 2</I>, the "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet" episode of <I>Twilight Zone: The Movie</I>, The Witches of Eastwick, Lorenzo's Oil</I> and the fascinating, hugely underrated <I>Babe: Pig in the City</I>), there's not a dud amongst them - and it's clearly the same sensibility behind them all.

Ben H
11-12-2002, 10:13
I'm not sure if this is a good idea.


Apart from Gibson's age, going back to an old franchise, etc etc, the Mad Max films were always pretty off the wall films. Would a mainstream US audience take to a film with men wearing jockstraps and gimp suits?

And then, you can bet any money that they'll stuff it full of CGI crap. Bring back real stunts like the chase in the Road Warrior! :clap:

Panavision
11-12-2002, 10:31
We don't need another hero :|

gooseUK
11-12-2002, 10:39
MAD MAX: FURY ROAD

Is it me, or is that just a great title? I mean, it really hints that this film could be darker and more brutal and back to the style of The Road Warrior. Or am I reading too much into this?

Willow
11-12-2002, 14:37
Originally posted by danielzavitz
that's $25 MILLION willow.
i too would be shocked if he was doing it for $25. *snigger* I left the 'M' in but it disappeared between this box and posting :D

It just seems like a helluva lot of money to me. Is he the top earner now?

martinb
11-12-2002, 14:56
I though Tom Hanks was the biggest earner.

Ol' Blue Eyes
11-12-2002, 15:52
Originally posted by martinb
I though Tom Hanks was the biggest earner.

He's as big a draw as anyone but Gibson and Cruise have dependable, lucrative franchises that they can ask practically any fee for appearing in. God knows what Cruise will get for MI3.

aprout
11-12-2002, 16:42
isn't Arnie getting $30 million for T3?

Mad Max 4 could be great if they get some top stunt people & keep the cgi to a minimum.

Lenny Nero
11-12-2002, 18:32
Originally posted by Ol' Blue Eyes
He's as big a draw as anyone but Gibson and Cruise have dependable, lucrative franchises that they can ask practically any fee for appearing in. God knows what Cruise will get for MI3.

Tom Cruise already got over $85 million for M-I:2 on his back-end producer's gig.

Dene
25-10-2007, 22:04
This project may well be back on (http://www.moviehole.net/news/20071025_mad_max_4_is_back_on.html), albeit probably not with Gibson.

Quite possibly the return of the Die Hard, Indiana Jones and Rambo franchises may have helped to kick this into touch? Still wish Gibson was coming back though, it won't be the same without him.

Richie
25-10-2007, 22:05
Mad Max without Mad Max. Winner.

Mr Majestik
25-10-2007, 22:19
Already posted

Go down a few posts...

Dene
25-10-2007, 22:41
Oops! Sorry.

Alan b
26-10-2007, 06:04
Please continue this here.

Closing