PDA

View Full Version : Barclays' Middle Eastern fundraising under fire


Enlightened
31-10-2008, 13:47
Anyone read about this today?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/31/barclay-sovereignwealthfunds

Barclays' Middle Eastern fundraising under fire

Adviser to Sheikh Zayed Al-Nahyan and Amanda Staveley, chief executive of PCP Gulf Invest - outside Barclays head office

Barclays is raising up to £7.3bn, mainly from Middle East investors, who could end up owning nearly a third of the UK's second largest bank.

The deal allows Barclays to strengthen its balance sheet without getting help from the taxpayer, but its terms, which are seen as generous to its new investors, drew fierce criticism today from Liberal Democrat deputy leader and Treasury spokesman Vince Cable.

"This is a scandal of mammoth proportions," he said. "Here is a bank which relies on the taxpayer to bail it out if the going gets rough but which has offered Middle Eastern investors a much better deal than the banks are offering to the British taxpayer."

Most of the cash injection is coming from the royal families of Abu Dhabi and Qatar, who have both agreed to pump billions into Barclays to bolster its capital ratios. The Qataris, who already own a significant shareholding in Barclays through two different investment funds, are providing up to £2.3bn. Once the deal goes through they will own up to 15.5% of the bank.

Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family, will provide up to £3.5bn and will become Barclays' largest shareholder with a 16.3% stake. A further £1.5bn is being raised from institutional investors.

The deal means that Barclays has avoided selling a stake to the UK government - the partial nationalisation option taken by Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds TSB and HBOS.

This means it will avoid restrictions on executive pay, bonuses and shareholder dividends.

"We have to ask why Barclays is willing to offer a better deal to foreign investors than the British taxpayer," Cable said. "The answer is simple: they don't want the British Government stopping them from paying massive bonuses to their executives.

"More than the other banks, Barclays operate a high-risk casino operation which makes the bank particularly unstable but which gives very rich pickings to the top executives. The British Government must not simply let this pass," he added.

A large chunk of the £5.8bn investment will buy "reserve capital instruments", similar to the preference shares which the UK government is taking in RBS and Lloyds TSB-HBOS. They will pay a dividend of 14% a year, compared with the UK government's 12% a year. The new shareholders will also own warrants allowing them to buy shares in Barclays at 197.775p, any time in the next five years.

Shares in Barclays jumped by 10% this morning in early trading, but had soon fallen by almost 10% to 185.5p as the City digested the deal.

Chairman Marcus Agius brushed aside the suggestion that Barclays was now too reliant on overseas investors. "This is a forward-looking and progressive approach to managing the share register," said Aguis, insisting that these deals create new commercial opportunities around the globe.

"When these strategic investors increase the exposure they have to Barclays they naturally leads to new business," Aguis added. Last year Barclays sold stakes to the goverments of China and Singapore, and in June this year it raised £4.5bn from new and existing shareholders - including Qatar.

Keith Bowman, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown stockbrokers, said Barclays had "proved the doubters wrong again".

"Barclays continues to underline management's strength in outflanking its rivals. RBS has been sunk through its desire to win Dutch Bank ABN from the hands of Barclays, whilst the group's knowledge of the wholesale markets and experience of the property downturn of the early 1990s has left it better positioned than the likes of HBOS," said Bowman.

Satisfying the government

Barclays has been forced to raise more capital as part of the bail-out scheme which seven banks and one building society have signed up to in the government's attempt to shore up confidence in the banking system.

The chief executive, John Varley, said the deal would enables Barclays to meet the capital issuance plan agreed with the UK authorities earlier this month, following the decision by the Financial Services Authority to increase the capital ratio requirements for all UK banks.

"Today's capital raising provides certainty and speed of execution, and combined with the strong third-quarter performance in a volatile operating environment enables us to continue to implement our strategy and build our business by serving clients and customers around the world," said Varley.

When the UK banking bail-out was being agreed with the Treasury earlier this month, Varley had convinced government officials and the Financial Services Authority, that it had one backer prepared to stump up £1bn. Roger Jenkins, a colleague of Barclays executive Bob Diamond, is believed to have led the negotiations to find backers prepared to put more cash into the bank.

The government is due to announce later today that it has approved the takeover of HBOS by Lloyds TSB. Based on today's share prices, Barclays will still be the UK's second largest bank by market capitalisation, worth almost £19bn, behind HSBC which is today worth some £89bn. Lloyds TSB and HBOS are today worth slightly over £17bn.

The lengths these bankers will go to protect their annual bonuses... :suspect:

At The Gates
31-10-2008, 14:56
And the annual coupons Barclays have offered to this group are tax deductible which means we (the UK taxpayer) pay for it. We pay oil rich billionaires who own 5 billion + in assets, several million pounds a year....AWESOME.

Just when i thought as a single 31 yr old with no mortgage, zero debts and lots of savings i couldn't get any more screwed over.

hahaha. You couldn't make this stuff up.

Kryten
31-10-2008, 15:13
Well you could have a mortgage and get even more ascrewed over (no tax relief still on mortgages, that would be an excellent way to help the average house owner in distress I think!)

daveyb
31-10-2008, 16:26
Something like this was on the cards. It isn't any secret that there are warchests of money in the cash rich middle eastern states.

I don't believe it will be the last either. It is a very good idea for some of these people to have stakes in the energy companies, to diversify their income stream.

arrowst
31-10-2008, 17:52
Does Amanda Staveley represent the whole of the Far East these days??

As a Barclays shareholder, I'm happy they've managed to independently raise sufficient capital to meet the governments rules, but at what cost. Barclays appear to have been prepared to pay well over the odds to avoid part-nationalisation (the deal is far worse than what the government offered them).

This is either very shrewd, as they'll be able to move forward as an independent entity (although I'll be interested to see the level of interference in RBS, Lloyds etc..) or a desperate measure to avoid opening their books up to the government, and the subsequent lock down of dividends, salaries and bonuses that this would entail.

Either way, it's not been a great investment for me in the short to medium term.

daveyb
31-10-2008, 18:30
Does this mean the arrival of 2 tier banking?