![]() |
|
|
#121 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Elzar, on those photos you've taken of your monitor, is your monitor doing any overscanning, or are we seeing the complete 1920 x 1080 image in these photos?
I've had a quick look at the DVD version to compare, and yes indeed the HD versions are missing stuff on the top and bottom, and in some cases the HD versions has a bit more on the sides. I could make a side-by-side comparison, but the only fair way to do this would be to make sure that both the HDTV captures and DVD captures are the complete image (no overscan on either) Marc Last edited by marcmartin; 26-09-2008 at 18:07. |
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Gamertag: bumgut
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Danger Zone
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
No overscanning, no. Like I said, it does feel crammed at times.
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Comparison - DVD vs. Blu-Ray
Okay, here is a DVD vs. Blu-Ray comparison:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by marcmartin; 27-09-2008 at 02:49. |
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Gamertag: bumgut
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Danger Zone
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Good stuff. I think if anything we may encourage a few more sales...
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
I Do Deny Them My Essence
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Saaf London
Posts: 5,586
Thanks: 20
Thanked 14 Times in 5 Posts
|
Well, at least they haven't just lopped off the top and bottom with no regard as to what's there. The height of the cropped frame (in relation to the original) does appear to vary from shot to shot, which would indicate that someone's paying attention.
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
....just not very well!!
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Holland Manners
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 16,663
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
No, well, that was his point.
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
His point was that he believed whoever was in charge of the HD copy was making sure the frame was optimised for each shot - a positive thing.
My point was that actually they were making a bad job of it as shown by the screenshots. And the shots on the whole look worse than I thought they would compared to the dvd based on the comments made that the dvd's were cropped on all 4 sides. Since they look much better than the Bluray images (apart from the colour) the dvd's come out quite well. Its a shame we cant actually see the full improvement in resolution too Last edited by dennisspooner; 27-09-2008 at 21:15. |
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
I Do Deny Them My Essence
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Saaf London
Posts: 5,586
Thanks: 20
Thanked 14 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: the framing, it looks if they've tried to keep a common topline at just above the highest (or only) head in the frame, where applicable. The last two shots are more severe regarding headroom, because the characters are using things in the lower portion of the frame that would almost be cropped out completely if the common topline was used (e.g. Tracey's communicator and Parker's steering wheel). Seems quite sensible to me.
Please note that I'm not condoning retrofitting like this, just pointing out that it's not as bad as it could've been. It's a pity that these aren't out in separate volumes, as one or two discs would be great for a rental just to see what's what. Last edited by Niceguygeoff; 27-09-2008 at 22:49. |
|
|
|
|
#131 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
I assume they would with Bluray too - but the screenshots are enough for me. £29.99 or 4:3 for me |
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Gamertag: bumgut
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Danger Zone
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
I MUST HEAR FIREWORKS
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bristol, in Bristol. Not Avon.
Posts: 7,088
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
At first glance the re-framing looks ok, but the more you look at them, the worse they get.
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Holland Manners
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 16,663
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
There's a little bit of extra picture on the left, but it's not enough to make up for the overall cropping. However seeing as it's likely Thunderbirds will probably only ever be available in 16:9 it's the only HD choice.
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Firth of fifth
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Langley
Posts: 1,616
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
It is frustrating I agree...but I cannot see ITV redoing the set any time soon, so its a case of take it or leave I think. I will pick up sometime, but no big rush... Like everyone else, a 4:3 is what I want!
Its a lose lose situation, I notice WB released Justice League Bluray in 4:3 and they got slated in every review for having black bars and not just cropping it to take advantage of the format....
__________________
Check this out! http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2276566/ |
|
|
|
|
#136 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
I don't think these old Gerry Anderson series were intended to be viewed cropped in widescreen, unless someone knows otherwise? |
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Holland Manners
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 16,663
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
They were made to be shown on TV at the time. At the time TV happened to be 4:3.
Whether or not one likes it, there's an argument to be made for releasing them cropped to 16:9 for HD. Because that's the way TV is now. Last edited by thescrounger; 28-09-2008 at 17:58. |
|
|
|
|
#138 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
And you are happy to see 2.35:1 films cropped to 1.85:1 now too? After all - its the way tv is now ![]() Luckily you are in a minority. It took years to get films released in widescreen and this bodge job is no different. There WILL be a 4:3 release of Thunderbirds at some point. But that could well be 5 years away knowing ITV I hope Network take advantage od ITV's shortsightedness and are given the opportunity to release the show properly Last edited by dennisspooner; 28-09-2008 at 21:10. |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 | |||
|
Holland Manners
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 16,663
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by thescrounger; 28-09-2008 at 21:14. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
pussylover9@shemail.com
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 22,643
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
It's not really a different issue at all. You are still losing image to 'fit' the TV. It's crap.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| blu-ray, thunderbirds |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thunderbirds | filmstar | Film Discussion | 126 | 22-09-2004 08:04 |
| Thunderbirds | Julian K | Film Discussion | 13 | 07-06-2004 18:24 |
| Thunderbirds Box Set R1 or R2 | Eddie | Film Discussion | 1 | 11-01-2003 09:23 |
| Thunderbirds are GO !! | Spooksta | Film Discussion | 2 | 14-09-2002 12:22 |